Born in 1895 in New York, Charles Daly King was
educated at Newark Academy, Yale and Columbia University. He graduated in
psychology, and after having fought as an officer during the First World War,
he became one of the biggest followers of Gurdjieff, interesting about the
sleep and its components, since his thesis, publishing thick essays about
psychology, including Beyond Behaviorism
(1927) and The Psychology of
Consciousness (1932). He was part of the group of AR Orage in New York and
later headed the group in Orange in New Jersey. Besides the two texts quoted,
he wrote a manuscript which circulated only in circles of fans, The Oragean Version. He died in Bermuda
in 1963.
From 1932, he wrote seven novels, six of which are published, which represent the legacy of vandinian mystery school, perhaps of more than the highest expression.
From 1932, he wrote seven novels, six of which are published, which represent the legacy of vandinian mystery school, perhaps of more than the highest expression.
Arrogant
Alibi is characterized,
like all the his other five novels (but we should say six, because you know for
sure that Daly King finished a seventh novel whom he was waiting to be
published after the Second World War, but that it was not more) from atmosphere
heavy with suspicion, and a plot as usual complicated: here Michael Lord
(police lieutenant), always accompanied by psychologist Rees Pons, is invited
to Hartford, home of the rich Victoria Timothy wife of an Egyptologist (rather,
predator of tombs) that has brought in America a large part of the things he
had stolen in Egypt, constituting in a place, united to his home, a gifted
museum. The name of this villa is Perkette.
That evening there will be a reception, during which they provided the musical entertainment, and will be attended Grant Worcester friend of Lord (is he who invited him) and his wife Garde; Charmion Dannish, girlfriend of Dr. Earley, young protege of the rich widow, who will sing, and the same Earley who should play something; the lawyer Gilbert Russell, office of the widow; and two Egyptologists, Ebenezer Quincey and Elisha Springer. However in the mid-evening, during the interval, Charmion having a bit of sore throat and remembering that in the bathroom next to the bedroom of the home mistress, on the first floor, there is a tube of aspirin, went there. She takes the aspirin, also she makes some gargle, then hears something in the neighboring room, and then not going across the door through which she entered, but from another through which the bathroom communicates with the dressing room adjoining the bedroom, she goes here.
That evening there will be a reception, during which they provided the musical entertainment, and will be attended Grant Worcester friend of Lord (is he who invited him) and his wife Garde; Charmion Dannish, girlfriend of Dr. Earley, young protege of the rich widow, who will sing, and the same Earley who should play something; the lawyer Gilbert Russell, office of the widow; and two Egyptologists, Ebenezer Quincey and Elisha Springer. However in the mid-evening, during the interval, Charmion having a bit of sore throat and remembering that in the bathroom next to the bedroom of the home mistress, on the first floor, there is a tube of aspirin, went there. She takes the aspirin, also she makes some gargle, then hears something in the neighboring room, and then not going across the door through which she entered, but from another through which the bathroom communicates with the dressing room adjoining the bedroom, she goes here.
A few minutes later, the Inspector Lord, downstairs, while the guests and
his friend Pons are in the room where there will be a concert, hears the sound
of a phone, but does not understand at first where it comes from; when he picks
up the phone, he learns from Dr. Earley, left shortly before, called at the home of a patient who is very
ill, that he would not return home to perform, because his patient is dead and
he must also attend to bureaucratic chores: he pleases Lord to report the
incident to the hostess excusing him. While he has laying the receiver, Lord is
intrigued by a faint glow of light at the end of a corridor, where he knows
that there are no lights, but while he is about to go and to see, first he
hears a loud scream and then the same cry more attenuated, that comes from
upstairs. Bouncing down the stairs, he hears a noise coming from the master
bedroom, he enters, and he sees Charmion deathly pale that looking at a point
she is going to faint. He supports her in time to see he too, a body lying on
the floor near the bed: is the body of
rich widow, with a dagger by the unusual shape, stuck in the throat, so that
the handle baits parallel to the chin.
Michael Lord, immediately sees a phone and tries to call the police, but
the line is silent because someone cut the wires: you will find that the
scissors used are those which come from the basket of embroidery work of the
mistress, placed elsewhere. Lord, puts Charmion on the bed and, after making
sure himself about the death of Victoria
Timothy, goes downstairs to ask the butler, Rath, when the hostess was uphill.
Also turns to his friend Grant Worcester, asking him to call the police because
there was a murder, even if that on the front does not believe him. Meanwhile,
the attention of Lord is again drawn to the dark corridor from which comes out
a dim light: he goes there and understand that ithrough it that the museum is
connected to the house. Gone into, he finds at a huge room, lit by a dim light,
two men, Springer and Quincey, self-styled Egyptologists, who are discussing
about the dating of something that attracts the attention of Lord: it is the
same dagger that a few minutes ago was stuck in throat of widow Timothy. Why is
there, more of everything clean?
Presenting himself to two men and
informing them about the death of the widow, Lord can know not only their names
but also to understand that that dagger is the twin of the other used for the
murder, and that both were in a showcase of the museum . When the three enter
newly in the house, the cops are coming, under the command of Lieutenant
Bergman of the police of Hartford.
According to the times, the murder seems committed within about sixteen minutes, from 22:45 (time at which the hostess was seen rising, by the butler, who testifies) to 23.01 (the time of discovery of the body part Lord). Only that at this time all seem to be in a barrel of iron: the majority of the guests, including spouses Worcester, Dr. Pons, Russell, were at the hall where was the concert and were still there when it was given the news of the death of Victoria Timothy and nobody saw someone get away; the two Egyptologists were at the time of the cry, in their room of the museum to examine the other dagger, and, unless each covers the other, could not have been them (they also would never know about the existence of the telephone wire and the place where to find the scissors, or you?); Dr. Earley was even out of the house and the phone call came from outside testifies it. So what? Who ever did kill her?
According to the times, the murder seems committed within about sixteen minutes, from 22:45 (time at which the hostess was seen rising, by the butler, who testifies) to 23.01 (the time of discovery of the body part Lord). Only that at this time all seem to be in a barrel of iron: the majority of the guests, including spouses Worcester, Dr. Pons, Russell, were at the hall where was the concert and were still there when it was given the news of the death of Victoria Timothy and nobody saw someone get away; the two Egyptologists were at the time of the cry, in their room of the museum to examine the other dagger, and, unless each covers the other, could not have been them (they also would never know about the existence of the telephone wire and the place where to find the scissors, or you?); Dr. Earley was even out of the house and the phone call came from outside testifies it. So what? Who ever did kill her?
At the hearing in front of the coroner, Lieutenant Bergman, gathered all
the evidence, called Charmion and Lord to testify, rebuilt the discovery of the
body, called Charmion later to explain why once finished gargle, she was not
simply out of the bathroom to go down
but had stretched the path entering the dressing room and from there
into the chamber of the Mrs Timothy from which she would have to go out in the
vestibule leading to the stairs, and not having been able to explain it, the
head of the investigation incriminates as the killer, even in contrary to legal
procedure of this.
At this point, Michael Lord, Dr. Earley and others agree to try to save the girl.
During the interrogation in front of Dr. Earley, that is the coroner in charge of defining the nature of the death of Mrs. Timothy, Grant Worcester, friend of Lord (is he who invited him to the party) accuses publicly such Kopstein, politician with disreputable friendships, to have made killing the woman, who opposed herself to his claims; and says he saw a man flee from the house. However, if these revelations are new , these are later denied by the revelation that no one came out of the house after Dr. Earley left: it is witnessed by a lot of persons.
At this point, Michael Lord, Dr. Earley and others agree to try to save the girl.
During the interrogation in front of Dr. Earley, that is the coroner in charge of defining the nature of the death of Mrs. Timothy, Grant Worcester, friend of Lord (is he who invited him to the party) accuses publicly such Kopstein, politician with disreputable friendships, to have made killing the woman, who opposed herself to his claims; and says he saw a man flee from the house. However, if these revelations are new , these are later denied by the revelation that no one came out of the house after Dr. Earley left: it is witnessed by a lot of persons.
However Kopstein is another point to be clarified. As well we learn that
the two alleged Egyptologists, old friends of husband of Mrs Timothy killed,
were not actually getting together in the museum to date the dagger, as
revealed to the investigators, but in turn they went to the toilet and then
leaving the showcase with the two
daggers into at the disposal of the other, as long as was not the Egyptologist who said he would
have gone to the toilet, to kill the rich widow.
In other words, if before the alibis were unassailable, now begin to see the stretch marks.
For more, you find that Quincey had a serious reason to kill her: he had a bill due of two thousand five hundred dollars that he would have to pay to the old woman at the day after the murder of her.
In other words, if before the alibis were unassailable, now begin to see the stretch marks.
For more, you find that Quincey had a serious reason to kill her: he had a bill due of two thousand five hundred dollars that he would have to pay to the old woman at the day after the murder of her.
Dr. Earley calls on the phone and happily he says that after a series of
tests, the position of Charmion has changed, because it has not disclosed any
possible motive against her, as well as anyone, Bergman, had suggested that
there could be.
Other strange things happen, however: by the maps of the various floors of the house, used in the renovation of the same house, is torn that about the first floor, where was murdered the old Timothy, a maze of corridors, dark corners, and rooms without a link, which can be accessed not only through the main staircase for which rose Charmion and Lord, but also through a secondary staircase. New questions.
Lord would re-query Quincey about the bill about which he didn’t speak, but he finds the door of the museum closed, boarded up from the inside and moreover he sees slide under the door some rivulets of a viscous liquid and dark red that is undoubtedly blood. He Shoots the door hinges, he manages to demolish it, without falling down to the poor Quincey lying on the ground, whom they find with the other twin dagger, stuck in the back: he, after to have mumbled words that are currently without sense, dies .
Other strange things happen, however: by the maps of the various floors of the house, used in the renovation of the same house, is torn that about the first floor, where was murdered the old Timothy, a maze of corridors, dark corners, and rooms without a link, which can be accessed not only through the main staircase for which rose Charmion and Lord, but also through a secondary staircase. New questions.
Lord would re-query Quincey about the bill about which he didn’t speak, but he finds the door of the museum closed, boarded up from the inside and moreover he sees slide under the door some rivulets of a viscous liquid and dark red that is undoubtedly blood. He Shoots the door hinges, he manages to demolish it, without falling down to the poor Quincey lying on the ground, whom they find with the other twin dagger, stuck in the back: he, after to have mumbled words that are currently without sense, dies .
The room was locked from the inside. Bystanders frisk it: there is no door
or window that may have been used to escape and moreover the sarcophagi are all
sealed by pieces of scotch old and yellowed. How did the stabber to eclipse, a
few minutes before all persons arrived,
without they had seen someone escape?
After Lord will first deciphered the words murmured to his ear from dying Quincey, whom Springer will reveal to be a magic Egyptian formula: Quincey would murmured “sersew wah wah wah wah”, ie 6-1-1-1-1, because obsessed by the magic of Ser Wah, the murderer will be nailed in a spectacular final at which it will be clarified how a first crime was committed without no one could have done, and how could escape a murderer from a locked room, not before an unassailable alibi was shattered.
After Lord will first deciphered the words murmured to his ear from dying Quincey, whom Springer will reveal to be a magic Egyptian formula: Quincey would murmured “sersew wah wah wah wah”, ie 6-1-1-1-1, because obsessed by the magic of Ser Wah, the murderer will be nailed in a spectacular final at which it will be clarified how a first crime was committed without no one could have done, and how could escape a murderer from a locked room, not before an unassailable alibi was shattered.
Extraordinary novel of Daly King, Arrogant
Alibi is one of the best novels of the '30s: fantastic setting, in a spooky
house, full of hiding places and dark corridors, blends puzzle mystery (here we
have the triumph of Whodunit: also an impossible crime and a crime in a locked
room ) with psychological mystery to grind an airtight alibi (with the triumph
of Howdunit), creating a superb staging in which the suspects and the persons
suspected appear and disappear, mysterious clues overlap (the phone cord
severed, two similar daggers, the time clock in the electrical room of the died
widow forward over twenty minutes compared with precise, the mysterious number
6-1-1-1-1), in which even the seedlings of various plans at which the tragedy
consumes contain puzzles (the torn page with the map of the first floor of
Perkette).
An extraordinarily vandinian novel.
The thinking behind the crushing of an airtight alibi, and the capture of
an evil murderer, is very complicated, son worthy of all this literature that
from Van Dine originated: the extremely
complicated thinking behind the solution of puzzle at The Bishop Murder Case, by S.S. Van Dine; The Greek Coffin Mystery, by Ellery Queen; or also About the Murder of the Clergyman’s Mistress,
by A. Abbot: it is as if Daly King had drawn from all other vandinian authors
that before him had their debut as part of the novel, creating a super novel
that had characteristics taken from various sources, but in the same time it
was not a mere collage, but new original work that transcended its same
original sources, creating and recreating all the problems of the enigma novel
of the '30s and bringing them to an unusual level of stylistic perfection.
Moreover, it is obvious that it’s a vandinian novel: first Michael Lord is
accompanied by his friend the psychologist Pons, and thus form a pair, at which
one of the two elements is an institutional figure: Ellery is related to his
father who is a police inspector, Philo Vance is related to Markham which is a
District Attorney, Abbot is linked to Thatcher Colt who is a Commissioner of
the Metropolitan Police. Daly King perhaps had as model for his Michael Lord, Lieutenant of Police, the
character created by Abbot, Thatcher Colt. There is also here a trick that
calls another vandinian famous, Ellery Queen, at least in his novels of the
'30), ie the dying message: what else is precisely Sersew Wah Wah Wah Wah? And yet vandinian is another feature: the
Egyptian setting. In fact, since the early 1900s when many tombs were
discovered and important excavations were undertaken in Egtitto until 1922, the
year of the discovery of the tomb of Tut-Ank-Hammon, there are many novels that
show locations of Egypt, from R. Austin Freeman (The Eye of Osiris, 1911) to Dermot Morrah (The Mummy Case Mystery, 1933), Agatha Christie (Death on the Nile, 1937 and Death Comes as the End, 1944). But, in
the novels of the so-called vandinian school, they rise to a real distinctive
character.
In fact, from the novel by S.S. Van Dine, The Scarab Murder Case, 1929, all
or most ,those who wanted to refer to Van Dine copying the elements of his
narrative style, ended up creating a novel that had Egyptian setting or artifacts that were related to ancient
Egypt or other exotic locations that could still arise from Van Dine: Ellery
Queen (The Egyptian Cross Mystery,
1933); Rex Stout (Red Threads, 1939)
in which the Egyptian setting becomes Indian setting ; Clyde B. Clason (The Man From Tibet, 1939) at
which to the setting in Egypt is replaced a Tibetan setting; Richard Burke (Chinese Red, 1940) in which the exotic
setting here becomes Chinese; and finally this novel Daly King.
The same trick that the murderer uses to get away
with it, brings us to the second novel by Van Dine The Canary Murder Case, not because it is the same instrument, but
because on an instrument of common use, ingeniously, the murderer builds his
foreignness to the realization of the crime.
Finally the Locked Room: when the room is more closed than ever, and cannot
be a suicide, and there was not something that has moved the time of the
assassination, and there are not conditions such that the murderer could
confuse himself with who had gone into the room, because it was dark or smoke,
and there are not other outputs, the solution is only one: there’s some form of
output… masked . This masked output then is found, but it is kept locked on the other side, by a
nail whose head is rusty which leads to think that output has not been used for
a long time. So what?
A new twist
will change this solution into another.
But the guilty will flee, only he will not escape a terrible death, that
will re-lead us to a previous novel by S.S. Van Dine, The Greene Murder Case.
After writing this article in Italian, I did read it to
my friend Mauro Boncompagni and I asked him why the only cover of this novel, which
is visible on the network (Collins
Crime Club, 1938) was too explicit,
revealing a lot of the novel. He told me that my remarks on the english cover of
the novel by King were just, but also told me something I did not know: it
seems that before me one of the greatest unrecognized and reviewers of mystery
novels , Torquemada, in a review of the book, in fact, appeared in the Observer
in 1938, had made the same my remarks. He also told me that he was a great admirer of Carr (Mauro told me that, because we are both fans of John Dickson Carr), as well as a refined man of culture and translator (with his real name Edward Powys Mathers) and compiler crosswords, past to history (under the pseudonym Torquemada). It seems that Colin Dexter has recently reminded him.
Pietro De Palma
No comments:
Post a Comment