Saturday, July 16, 2022


Many people have already tried their hand at the tantalizing game of elaborating a list of Locked Rooms, the best ones according to their taste and knowledge, and from the comparison between the various lists, some firm points emerge that it will be worth considering.

First point: The Carr Problem.

John Dickson Carr is humanly considered the greatest and unsurpassed Master of Locked Rooms, the one who sounded out the genre by inventing novels with the most absurd and electrifying situations. So, come on, anyone who wants to draw up a list of Locked Rooms, cannot fail to confront Carr. Especially since he was not only a specialist, but a great novelist, with a great narrative technique, and with breathtaking descriptions and atmospheres, which, due to their density, lent themselves well to being dramatized on the radio. So a great writer, who can give you serious headaches. 

For what reason? For one above all: if the list will include Carr, of course it will have to be copious, far exceeding the number 50; if, on the other hand, one wanted to prepare an essential one, in my opinion one would have to exclude a priori Carr, who is a separate case. In fact, creating a list, in which to insert one or two of Carr's novels would not only be an understatement but also unfair, because each great Locked Room of him is a speech in itself, which deserves to be remembered. Moreover, it has happened that in the case of a very famous list, that of Lacourbe, for a sort of national chauvinism or national pride that we want to define it in this way, six seven novels by Carr have been contrasted with six seven by Halter.

Second Point: The Halter Problem

Now here, we touch on a controversial point, because Paul Halter is the greatest writer of Locked Rooms, after Carr and Hoch (the greatest in the genre of short stories), and therefore lends himself well to being remembered and perhaps compared. This touches me even more, because in the past I made an interview with Paul, whose friendship I enjoy, and therefore I find it somewhat problematic to talk about it: But since I have already experienced the discourse elsewhere, and I have discussed it with him ( in French, of course), I don't see why I shouldn't repeat it here: for me the greatest is Carr, without a shadow of a doubt, and he is unsurpassed for one very simple aspect, namely the fact that he was a well-rounded writer, the whose novels had not only very complicated problems, but also great atmospheres and great killers, that is, the psychological nature of the perpetrator was very well analyzed. In Paul's novels, on the other hand, if virtuosity in itself reaches absolutely unusual peaks, perhaps even higher than Carr, it loses a lot in the characterization of the characters, because very often his characters are either psychically ill or are women or boys, there are no that is, well-curated characterizations of murderers except in exceptional cases, even if the atmospheres are also well developed. It is a bit the same thing that could be said, obviously in smaller areas, for Clayton Rawson, a writer who, as an illusionist he was, has created some extraordinary examples of Locked Rooms, including the absolute best brain breaker in my opinion. together with The Hollow Man , that is Death from the Top Hat: in fact, even though he is a master of insoluble problems, he is lacking in something: in his case in atmospheres, which are rather cold.Lacourbe, on the other hand, in his list of 99 Chambers (which are actually more) places the two in a sort of confrontation, limiting the consideration of the others in some way. In his case, then, there is an exorbitant presence of French classics, to the detriment of the Anglo-Saxon ones, and the almost absence of Chambers elaborated by writers of other nationalities: for example. there is nothing of Italian.

Third Point: the Country Problem

This is also another controversial point: in fact in a list that respects itself, and as impartial as possible, both French and Anglo-Saxon literature should be present, because the French in the 1930s created some extraordinary examples that are however very little considered in the Anglo-Saxon world due to the lack of translations, which John Pugmire is doing little by little, but an isolated case. And so if Hoch's list does not present even one, Lacourbe's list presents many, perhaps too many.

Fourth Point: the Language Problem

A further point should then be examined: is it right to draw up one that contains all the best rooms ever, or only the best ones translated into the language of the nation in which you live? Well, I would be inclined to indicate briefly one that is absolutely, and in which the novels are cited not on the basis of a ranking that would be inappropriate for the presence of Carr's novels compared to the less numerous other writers, novels of Carr who would inevitably end up with higher votes than others, but to a list of titles, all equally important.

Difference between Locked Room and Impossible Crime

A further reason for reasoning concerns what is meant by Locked Rooms: commonly, by Locked Rooms we sometimes also mean the so-called Impossible Crime. In fact, many authors consider the two terms to be essentially comparable. For me, on the other hand, these are two distinct things, due to the elements they contain: the crime that is impossible in itself, although it often takes the form of a sleight of hand or an illusion (see Lord of the Sorcerers for example, or The Emperor's Snuff-box), it is not a real Locked Room: in fact, for one to rightly speak of a Locked Room, it is necessary that there is not only a well-marked temporal element (which perhaps can exist alone in the Impossible Crime: eg. Tour de Force by Christianna Brand) but also space: I would say almost above all space. That is, it is necessary that there is a well-defined space, in which a murder or a disappearance of something took place, without the conditions for which someone could have gone out: therefore we will have a room closed by door and windows, with inaccessible chimneys. and without trap doors and secret doors; or a house surrounded by intact snow, or a crime that took place on a beach with sand without footprints around it. Or it must have happened outside in front of the eyes of those present without anyone having seen the killer (The Black Spectacles). Or it even happened in the rain, without there being wet footprints (in a novel by De Angelis).

Following Lacourbe's false line, which mind you I deeply respect, perhaps even for having published all of Carr's radio plays in French, I could draw up my own list in which to include Italian novels as well; however, like Lacourbe's list, mine too would end up being chauvinistic, as it would end up that an Italian list, with even Italian novels, would end up excluding novels of other nationalities, perhaps more deserving.

So in the end, not drawing up a list of 100 novels, like Lacourbe, but trying to remedy his moles and aiming to be as super partes as possible, I will draw up my essential and essential list of 25 (+ 1) novels, only with Locked Rooms, and not with Crimes Impossible, in which I will go against many common thoughts, including an Italian novel (translated into English by Igor Longo, and published by Locked Rooms International)

Considering the Master to be a unique and unrepeatable case, I will put his novels in the head, and then to follow, distinguished according to the alphabetical order, those of other novelists

I know that every reader who will read this list will have to object and present their own inclusions while excluding some novels I have included. However, I tried to be as impartial as possible, and nevertheless I have to justify some sensational exclusions:





John Dickson CARR : The Hollow Man & The Juda’s Window

Clayton RAWSON: Death from a Top Hat

Christianna BRAND : Death of Jezebel

Paul HALTER : La Quatriéme Porte

Derek SMITH : Whistle Up The Devil

Pierre BOILEAU : L’assassin vient les mains vides

Edgar WALLACE: The Clue of the New Pin

S.S. Van DINE : The Kennel Murder Case

Leo BRUCE: Case for Three Detectives

Alan GREEN: What a Body!

Charles ASHTON: Dance for A Dead Uncle

Peter SHAFFER : The Woman in the Wardrobe

Seishi YOKOMIZO: Honjin Satsujin Jiken

Keigo HIGASHINO: Hakuba Sansō Satsujin Jiken

Peter LOVESEY : Bloodhounds

Anthony BOUCHER: Nine Times Nine

Anthony WYNNE: The Case of the Gold Coins

John RHODE: Invisible Weapons

Alexis GENSOUL & Charles GRENIER: La Mort vient de nulle part

Edmund CRISPIN: The Moving Toyshop

Anthony BERKELEY : The Layton Court Mystery

Franco VAILATI: Il mistero dell’Idrovolante (The Flying Boat Mystery)

Yukito AYATSUJI: Jukkakukan no Satsujin

Randall GARRETT: Too Many Magicians

Ulf  DURLING : Gammal Ost (Hard Cheese)


Rim of the Pit by TALBOT: as I wrote in an article of mine several years ago (taken up and made his own in one of his theses by an Italian scholar, without citing me), although the novel is beautiful, it has a very big flaw: that of inserting apparently impossible things, explaining them not in an exhaustive way and often climbing on mirrors (as Halter sometimes does); for the rest I refer to my article:


The Chinese Orange Mystery by Ellery Queen: it is not a Locked Room, as it would seem, but an impossible crime: the reason is that the chamber is not closed, but open.


Invisible Green by John Sladek, I personally did not like it, because the solution is too far-fetched even if it is magnificent: the best solutions are those that seem crazy and then come down to nothing or almost nothing and that can be simply replicated. I liked Black Aura by Sladek, even if the solution is too complex there. And above all, a masterpiece is the short story By an Unknown Hand.


Tom inserts Mr Splitfoot, by Helen McCloy probably for the sound effect, not knowing that, however, the same was invented in exactly the same way (and therefore I would speak of derivation) by Charles Ashton (I wrote it in the related article). In the same way I do not insert a novel that I liked very much like The Gilded Fly by Edmund Crispin, because the solution derives (I don't know whether deliberately or not) from the novel I have quoted by Gensoul & Grenier.


The Tokyo Zodiac Murders by Soji Shimada, is not mentioned, because despite being one of the most beautiful novels I have ever read, for the delusional fantasy, its locked room is nothing special, referring to the one invented by other authors.


One final reflection. I was undecided whether to include among Italian locked room writers, the Vailati novel or De Angelis novel: De Angelis's is much more novel than Vailati's, which focuses only on the Locked Room, but while in “L’ Albergo delle Tre Rose” (The Hotel of the Three Roses) the Locked Room, despite being there, it is only one of the three crimes, and is not even mentioned as such by De Angelis obviously not interested in the impossible crime in itself, in other case (The Flying Boat Mystery) the whole novel is based on the crime and the solution is phantasmagoric, a sleight of hand.


Pietro De Palma

Monday, June 13, 2022

John Dickson Carr : The Diamond Pentacle, 1939 (from Merrivale, March and Murder, 1991)




The Diamond Pentacle is among Carr's best short stories ever.

It dates back to 1939, a period characterized by intense production, both for novels (The Problem of the Wire Cage and The Black Spectacles, with Doctor Fell, The Reader is Warned with Merrivale and Drop to His Death, written together with John Rhode, without a fixed character), and short stories (New murders for old, Strictly diplomatic, Harem Scarem).

It was published under the pseudonym Carter Dickson, in the Times on November 15, 1939. It was later included in the March Merrivale and Murder collection, which, edited by Douglas G. Green - dates back to 1991 - costs $ 193 .. used. I had the opportunity to read the story thanks first to Doug, but the scan in some parts was unreadable, and then thanks to Arthur Vidro.

The story is not about a murder or an injury, but in any case something absolutely impossible if not explained with the common reasoning: that is, how someone can enter a locked room from the inside, leave tangible evidence that he has entered, and leave it.





In essence, the plot is summed up in this: Dick Mason and Sheila Lake spend a week together in Broadlawns, the Bart Lake estate. They have known each other for about a month and they fell in love. She doesn't know exactly what he does. On more than one occasion he has shown interest in his speeches, especially recently, for the jewels that are stored in the wall safe in Sheila's room and in particular the Pentacle of Diamonds, donated by Uncle Bart to Aunt Martha. Even if the girl believes that the young man's worries about a possible theft are absolutely useless, because the safe is of the latest type, and what's more she always locks it from behind, and in the house besides her and Dick, there is Major and Mrs. Prentice, however the skirmishes go on. Dick is not fully convinced of the goodness of Aunt Martha's invitation, who has never been able to see him, despite the fact that Uncle Bart immediately sympathized with him. Sheila begins to have some suspicions towards Dick, who at some point bets with her that if he will prove to her that he can get into her bedroom during the night, even though she locks herself from the inside, she will take the steps to transfer. the jewelry in a safer place. The fact is that what the young man predicted happens promptly. The next day, another complication also happens: Agnes Prentice tells her husband (they are friends of Uncle Bart and Aunt Martha) of how she discovered that Bart has hired high-ranking detectives to find out who Dick actually is. So when the hosts return from Scotland and Major Prentice picks them up at the station, he reports the situation to the landlord and then they decide to confront the young man and the girl who doesn't answer the calls. When they enter the young woman's bedroom, they find her in a negligee while the clothes of him, are still wet. Cornered, Dick will tell another story, which concerns the subtraction of the Pentacle, yes, but not done by him, and in his defense he will tell the facts as they went, he will demonstrate them and so with a certain happy ending, (his and girl) ends the story. It is not known how Uncle Bart and Aunt Marta behaved.




I kept quiet about so many things.

First of all, Carr's story, twenty pages, is delightful.

There is Carr's usual way, old romantic, when he has to talk about the relationship of an engaged couple: there are skirmishes, the young man and the young woman have met and have been flirting for a month already, and he already wants to put things together. clear about the possibility of keeping the girl (after less than a month!). There is the embarrassing situation when they discover them in the girl's bedroom, locked from the inside, with her in a negligee that lets you see something and he is not at all embarrassed even if with damp clothes on, as if at night he had gone out without an umbrella .

Carr, with his usual style, succeeds from the very first pages, with Dick's allusions to a possible theft, with his allusions to the famous escapologist Mephisto, with his repeated request to transfer the Pentacle from the very secure safe to another hiding place, to instill doubt in Sheila (and the reader) that Dick is a jewelry thief. Except then, with one of his usual pirouettes, to overturn everything, providing the explanation of his fears about the Pentacle and why he did not want him to continue to stay in Sheila's room, to want to protect her. From what I am not saying, because then I would take away the pleasure of the average reader to find out.

Obviously, the Pentacle of diamonds in the safe is not there. Dick has it, but he's not a thief.

Let's leave out the rest, to make some notes on the story itself.

In that 1939, in the context of the four written stories, this is the most detective one, in the strict sense: Harem Scarem is an adventurous tale, Strictly Diplomatic has a plot that pertains to espionage, and New murders for old is finally a tale of the supernatural . Strictly Diplomatic would also have an impossible situation, but between it and The Diamond Pentacle, the pearl is the latter in my opinion: first of all for how it bases the story to explain the lack of the Pentacle from the super-safe safe; why Aunt Martha, while not digesting the young man, invited him in the absence of her and her husband to their house; and how Dick explains after explaining everything else, that gem about how he managed to break into a door hermetically closed from the inside, entering the room and then leaving, closing it behind him.

The solution is absolutely extraordinary, but in a certain sense it loses its boom effect if the reader has already read all of Carr's novels: I say this because, as happened other times in Carr, the solutions and plots of some stories become the basis for the creation of novels. And here too, the solution of the locked room of The Diamond Pentacle will be found years later in the explanation of the third impossible suicide in The Case of the Constant Suicides, as it is: not only in the explanation, but also in the object with which here Dick, the murderer there, will have made possible the impossible closure of a room from the inside. Here, if we want, the impossibility is double, because in addition to having closed the door behind him, Dick first opened it. Since the trick to close the door is the same, carried out with the same tools, Carr systematically excluded the story from his anthologies.

In my opinion there would also be another gem: when Dick Mason justifies himself in front of Bartholomew Lake and Major Prentice, telling his truth which is almost the opposite of what he was charged up to that moment, he exclaims: I've made a remarkable ass of myself, ”he said. "I’ve been the world’s most whacking fool; but now, by thunder and Long John Silver, there are limits! "(page 14). When he swears in recalling Long John Silver, it may have been because he points out a person's ambiguous conduct. Long John Silver, I remember, is the pirate with the wooden leg and the parrot perched on his shoulder, from Treasure Island, by Stevenson.

Ultimately, whoever manages to find the story, and has the novel to read, will have to decide which one to read first.

But not reading this story, it's a real… crime!


Pietro De Palma

Monday, May 30, 2022

John Dickson Carr : The Legend of the Cane in the Dark, 1927( from The Halverfordian) and its evolution into The Man Who Was Dead, 1935 and New Murders for Old, 1939



As many know, John Dickson Carr, while studying at Halverfordian College in Pennsylvania, wrote numerous short stories in the College magazine of which he was editor, The Halfervordian. In the context of the magazine, the stories are almost always exposed in the course of meetings between some characters, of which the main ones will also appear later in novels: this is the case, for example. by Bencolin and Sir John Landevorne. Among the stories enunciated in the Haverfordian stories there are the 4  of Bencolin collected later in The Door To Doom, but also other stories. This is the case in particular of a story, starring another of the characters who find themselves reunited by Sir John Landevorne, the freelance journalist and writer Stoneman Wood.

This story was later taken up several times by Carr, to testify how he probably intended to fully exploit the tragic and supernatural aura of the story. However, we note how the three drafts differ, even considerably, in relation to the use that the story had to be made of.




The first draft dates back to March 1927: in this case, part of the Haverfordian's New Canterbury Tales is the short story "The Legend of The Cane in the Dark". Given the unavailability of the story in publications, I will specify its content.




Mr Stoneman Wood is a freelance writer and journalist. He and cousin Stephen are the sole heirs of Uncle Stoneman's fortune. After a trip to Canada, during which Wood was close to being killed by the guide who had mistaken him for a moose, he returns home, just to read in a newspaper that he himself died of a heart attack.

Once off the train, he sets off for home, but as he walks he hears the sound of a stick behind him: he turns and sees a tall figure wrapped in a black coat. And where he walks there is always this disturbing presence behind him with a walking stick, until he can't stand it anymore and runs towards the house, chased by the figure. He arrives in his room closes, but he smells a disgusting sweet smell, and in the dark touches a series of flowers. When he turns on the light again, the figure is there in front of the door asking him why there is a dead person in his bed. Wood, pulls the sheet away and sees someone who has been dead for some time who looks just like him.

Not understanding anything anymore, he throws himself out of the room in search of cousin Stephen, and if any of his family members appear outside the door of his room, for example. Aunt Miranda immediately closes it again in terror because she sees a ghost in him. When he finally finds his cousin Stephen, he takes the gun and points it at him, and he would also fire, if something behind Wood did not terrify him, to the point of convincing him to confess that he tried to have his cousin killed, to take possession of his fortune. which they inherited from their uncle, who died some time before, who always had a black coat and a cane with him.

After the cousin confessed - not only the attempt to kill his brother by means of a false guide, but also to have killed the double by simulating a heart attack, something certified by a doctor procured by Stephen himself (if he is a doctor and not just an impostor), in the absence of a family doctor, the otherworldly being - like Don Giovanni's Guest of Stone - leaves the scene, proud of having accomplished his mission: to protect his nephew from the greedy cousin he was looking for to kill him and have made sure that he confessed his guilt: in fact you can hear his footsteps that go down the stairs and then the shadow leaves the house.




When will Carr pick up the story and on what occasion? Eight years later, in 1935, Carr had the opportunity to sell the story to one of the magazines that published very strong stories, the Dime Mystery Magazine (which published tales of terror from 1932 to 1950. Its founder and editor, Harry Steeger, was deeply influenced by the Grand Guignol Theater in Paris, which offered shows based on stories of terror). In the thirties there were several American pulp magazines, which published stories with a very strong plot, which were based on various genres, from Sci-Fi, to Fantasy, from Western to Crime Fiction: they were magazines with sensationalist covers, with very bright colors. 




Carr, who in 1935 was already "a name" among the new writers, thought it best to derive something from that story he had published eight years earlier, and which lent itself very well to being dramatized, appearing however under a pseudonym (John Dixon Carr ): a man who learns that he is dead, is chased by a supernatural creature, who thinks it is a real threat to him and who instead in the epilogue discovers that he was dead for others, who has returned from the afterlife only to to prevent a real villain from killing him.

Thus was born The Man Who Was Dead, then later reunited with other short stories, radio plays and essays by Carr in The Door To Doom. Of the three versions of the same story, according to many (and for me too), this is the best of the three: those who want to read it must get the volume The Door To Doom.




Nicholas Lessing is a writer who suddenly became very rich, having inherited the fortune of an uncle he never met: he had previously fought in the First World War where he had suffered serious damage to his lungs from breathing asphyxiating gas. So the personal doctor had seriously advised him a trip by ship to Africa, where he would have to stay some time, to breathe pure air first while sailing and then on the African continent, so that he could heal. When he returns, eager to hug his fiancée Judith again, he gets off the steamer, takes the train to Waterloo station, and reads in the copy of the newspaper he bought, that he, Nicholas Lessing, died on March 15, the day before, for a chronic pleurisy, which would have been cured if instead of remaining in London, he had gone on the journey that his doctor had advised him, to breathe fresh air after a voyage at sea. How is it possible? He is alive and well! He then hurries back home, but loses his taxi and is therefore forced to use the subway, the one that his uncle from whom he had inherited, had defined "the road in the middle of hell". And so already when he makes the ticket, following the error of the conductor who made two, he begins to suspect that behind him there is someone or something threatening. Something that becomes more acute as he walks through the tunnels in search of the train, and which reaches the climax when already inside the car, he feels something or someone who, as if by scratching with his knuckles, tries to open the door of the car, but in vain. When the subway train arrives at Charing Cross, Lessing changes trains and is finally safe to be alone. Yet when the train enters a tunnel, he hears a noise as if something has entered through a window, and a strange smell. Then someone terrified enters his compartment who speaks of a very high presence, of someone blind who inspired terror, and begs him to go away with him.

Lessing returns home, which would later be the home of his uncle who died a year earlier, Douglas Lessing, to hug his girlfriend, who he had read in the article, had witnessed his death, along with his brother Stephen Lessing, and aunt Ann Handerson. He comes back thinking about who is following him and for what reason. When he enters his house, he smells of closed air, carpets and curtains and a sickening smell of flowers. Then he enters his room in the dark, and almost bumps into what he thinks is a table and which then realizes that it is a coffin, which contains the corpse of him, of a Nicholas Lessing, just like him. He runs away and goes to his aunt who sees him as a being from hell and locks herself in his room. The only one who believes him is his Judith. But in the meantime, the being who chases him has managed to climb the stairs: you can hear the stick that he holds, which touches the steps. Nicholas goes to his brother and finds him outside the door of his room, who looks at him with a mad expression of fear, not so much for him as for being behind Nicholas, a being from the Underworld for him, who throw on him. The two face off in the room which is locked from the inside and then a shot. When Nicholas Lessing breaks down the door, Stephen is dying from the bullet that shot himself in the chest and punctured the lung. He will confess that ...



In this story the uncle is not called Stoneman but Lessing, Douglas Lessing. He changes the name, but the story is always the same, so even here and in the third version that we will reconstruct later, the spirit of the Underworld is the Man of Stone. And in this story more than in the other days, there are many allusions to the Underworld.

The story The Man Who Was Dead, which is an authentic masterpiece of the supernatural, is structured in a very articulated way, so that the supernatural origin of being, who is then the dead uncle, is remarked in an obsessive way, by degrees. : first, Lessing thinks that something must have happened to the conductor, if he issued two tickets, as if he and "another" were together; and that this someone must have impressed the conductor if he looked at him a certain way, although Nicholas isn't quite sure of that. This state of doubt leaves room for a feeling of apprehension as he ventures into the subway tunnels, which had been defined some time before by his dead uncle, Douglas Lessing, "Halfway to Hell": it is as if the encounter with the supernatural creature, it was realized just when Nicholas enters and then ventures into the subway, a hellish way; and that same noise that terrifies him so much, that is, of knuckles and nails scraping the doors of the train as if trying to open them (don't the nails have demons?) ceases only when the train leaves for its final destination, and exits from underground. And when Nicholas hears a strange noise and perceives a strange smell? When the train enters another tunnel, another hellish corridor. The smell, which we can associate with a feeling of nauseating, sends us back to death: and it is a further step, to testify of what nature it is the being that follows it. Lessing will smell that sickening smell when he returns to his house, which was later that of his tycoon uncle. The same smell that in the third story will bind us to the olfactory sensation of moldy fur, that of the overcoat of the dead uncle. When he enters the house, he finds a double of him in a coffin. But in that figure so close to him, he finds the elements to disagree with that false truth proclaimed: the fellow soldier he had met in the war who looked like him like a drop of water.

Also in this second story, an important element that makes the story haunting is the noise of something dragged on the ground: a stick, which we had seen in the first story to be central. Here, the clothing is given by a shapeless overcoat and a grungy hat, almost as if it were a scarecrow. The greatcoat that was the black coat of the first story and the moldy fur coat of the last.

Why does the conductor talk about a blind being, and then the terrified passenger in the train adds to the dose, speaking of him as a very tall and blind figure? Not because you don't see, but because you wear glasses that let you glimpse that behind there are only two orbits you want: wasn't it death represented by a being with a skull face and wearing either a hooded robe or some ramshackle dress? Here in the orbits, when the being reveals itself to its brother, mad with fear, there are cobwebs, and from them yellow-black spiders fall. Death reveals what the task he is there for: she wants Stephen, she wants to take him with her. Stephen is a damned. He is alive, and he will be dead. And that he is damned, he fears it. Because? Because when Lessing walks into the room and crushes a big black spider that testifies that death has passed from there, his terrified brother begs him to reveal that that being is not the demon he thinks, but only an actor paid to have him fall into. mistake and betrayed himself. Because he fears meeting him again, in hell.

Once again, the noise of the stick brings the supernatural being back to the center of the problem: he has not gone away, he is leaving, but he will not go completely as long as Stephen is still alive. He leaves at dawn, because then Stephen dies. Not by chance at dawn, when the light comes out. Death returns in the darkness: a very tall figure is seen, carrying an old overcoat and a rickety hat under his arm, walking towards where? The subway, a road that according to old Douglas Lessing was the “Halfway to Hell”. When Stephen dies, that is, evil is defeated, and death returns to the Underworld, good triumphs: at that moment Nicholas embraces both Judith who had believed in him, and who as her aunt, did not. recognized. And the contrast that is typical of a Carrian supernatural story disappears: everyday life, opposed to an unreal reality, the Natural opposed to the Supernatural. That is, we return to a situation prior to the one in which the supernatural had peeped out.

But that it is a supernatural, fantastic story, the contrast that we read at the beginning of the story also testifies, when Nicholas Lessing recalls in the hushed rooms of his club, the Naughts-and-Crosses Club, how it all began: he introduces a reasonable doubt that everything has happened, when he mentions that everything manifested while he was tired from the journey, it was raining and it was night, all elements that contrast with the light of day, when we are rested and see things in the right light. But it is precisely the contrast between the hushed and safe life of the Club and the future of things that contrast with it, which produces the striking contrast that introduces Carr's supernatural stories. Doglas G. Greene, who introduces the stories, rightly states that the same places are where Carter Dickson will place the beginning of The Plague Court Murders. After all, it is that perception of something wrong, of astonishment, of doubt, which produces the fantastic, and which Todorov rationalized in his famous essay.

We note that in the three stories, respectively in that of 1927, in this one of 1935 and in that of 1939, the name of the protagonist is always different: in the first it is Wood Stoneman, in the second Nicholas Lessing, in the third Anthony Marvell, while a curious thing is the name of the villain, it is always the same: Stephen; only the relationship of kinship changes: in the first story he is a cousin, while in the second and third he is brother. The uncle also changes: in the first he is Stoneman, in the second he is Douglas Lessing, in the third he is the founder Jim Marvell. The other characters may or may not be there. It is obvious that the figure of the bad relative, in the second and third stories, is sharpened in wickedness: a brother who kills another brother for reasons of greed makes more impression than a cousin.

Together with the name that changes and that represents the dead uncle, the objects that represent him also change and that have a visual, olfactory and sound importance: the stick that makes a characteristic noise in the first story; the stick, which also makes noise, and the hat and coat in ramshackle as they appear in the second; the fur that smells of rotten, in the third.




After having published the basic story changing its connotations and name in 1935, Carr took it up once again, adapting it this time for the magazine "Illustrated London News", on the occasion of Christmas 1939 and entitled it New Murders for Old ; however the story was reprinted on another occasion under the title The One Real Horror. The first edition, the English one, with the first title mentioned, New Murders for Old was then reprinted in the "Department of Queer Complaints" collection the following year, 1940.




The story is that of the heir to a luxury hotel chain that went down the drain, founded by the old Jim Marvell. Inherited from his nephew Anthony, a young man devoted to a brilliant career as a mathematician and forced instead by the last will of his uncle who loved him, to take care of his hotels, instead of selling them and making as much as possible, as his brother Stephen, a surgeon, would have done. is applied to it, "mind and body" tirelessly, so that after two years of hard work and self-denial, risking nervous exhaustion, he manages not only to save them from failure but even to bring them to a sensational activity, to make them a destination for all the rich people who want a luxurious vacation.

But the setbacks are nervous in nature. And so despite him, he agrees to also give up the company of his girlfriend Judith Gates, a girl of humble origins, and to take a cruise that will keep him away from home for six months.

However, as soon as he embarked, his misadventures began: entering the cabin, he no longer found the baggage that he had left with his brother Stephen. Having reported the matter to the Purser, he hears the reply that it is he who gave the order just before unloading his luggage, directly, to the Purser himself. Tony doesn't know what to do and begins to doubt himself, his own mental clarity. He orders them to go get the bags, but then when he gets back into the cabin, he finds a pistol with bullets in the magazine on the mattress of the bed. He is increasingly confused, but instead of throwing it away from the porthole into the sea, he takes it with him. He even doubts that it is actually his. And he is increasingly convinced that he himself is the cause of his troubles: a conscious part of him is haunted by an unconscious one. Nothing happens once the ship has left port, except for one thing that makes him question his mental abilities: he has the impression on more than one occasion that old Uncle Jim is spying on him, tucked up in his old coat with an old-fashioned fur collar: the fact is that Jim Marvell is dead and gone.

After about six months of absence, perfectly recovered and feeling full of his mental faculties, he decides to return home. But here in the train that is taking him back, in his compartment he finds a newspaper of the day before that talks about his death by suicide. Recovering from his surprise, he apprehensively discovers that it cannot be a fake: the article is too detailed, the people are those of his family, the places are those of his ancestral home. Tony doesn't know what to fish for, he even begins to doubt he's Tony Marvell. Meanwhile, there is someone on the train who does not lose sight of him, a person with an old-fashioned fur collar.

Tony tries to get into the cab, and here the guy is behind him. It's snowing. The taxi would arrive at its destination and above all he would be able to sow that unwanted visitor once and for all, but the taxi has an accident having had to avoid at the last moment a man covered by a heavy coat with a fur collar.

Tony gets out of the car and lo and behold, his unwanted companion is behind him. He accelerates the pace and the same. Tony runs, but also the one behind him. Tony has the house keys, he is about to open the door but they escape him. When he succeeds, that vaguely familiar figure is behind him. Seized by terror he tries to react by trying to grab the gun but it falls. He takes refuge upstairs and enters his room. He turns on the lights and notices that someone is lying in his bed, covered by a sheet. He conquers fear, discovers the sheet and finds himself another Tony Marvell.

Shocked, he turns and sees his brother Stephen talking to him but while this happens, the figure that haunted him is there. Stephen screams, screams, one hand, that of being locks Tony in his room in the company of his double, and then, after another cry for help from Stephen, after the housekeeper has rushed in time to see the door of Stephen's room close, here is a gunshot: Stephen is found killed with a gunshot to the head.

And the killer? Volatilized: the windows were bolted. No one was present inside when they opened the door, and outside was the housekeeper who swears that no one, absolutely no one has entered. To testify that there might be someone there, just a faint smell of moldy fur.

The story ends as it began: the CID superintendent told Tony's story to his girlfriend Judith. Tony is free from any suspicion and he owes it above all to the fact that he has been locked in his room. Stephen is dead. Suicide, is the final verdict. No one was in that room and no one could have left it. But why would he ever kill himself? And who was Tony's double? But was he really Tony, Tony Marvell?




Of the three versions of the same story, the second is the longest and the most terrifying: it is normal for Carr to amend the most terrifying passages, for a re-edition with another title, for a Christmas edition.

Already in the first lines you begin to sense the horror of the story: Sir Heargraves, Superintendent of the CID, is telling a story to another person and they are in a room: the identity of the person is unknown and will be revealed only at the end, because if it were revealed immediately, it would remove some suspense from the story. Plus Sir Hargraves alludes to a "thing" that was there on the bed. Mind you: he is talking about a "thing". Then Carr writes that the air had a faintly sweet smell. Sweetish! When this meaning is used in a detective novel, a mystery, the reference is always to the decomposition of a body: putrefaction gives rise to nauseating and sweetish scents.

The way in which Carr introduces the story already has the touch of genius in it: it's cold and snowing outside, but inside the atmosphere is suffocating, and there is still a touch of sweetness. When he talks about something about the bed, it reminds me of a Talbot novel. Surely this calling the body on the bed "what" is a direct reference to that other "thing", on the bed of another bedroom, in The Hangman's Handyman.

Hake Talbot's novel is from 1942. Talbot and Carr were friends: it is well known. At least it seems strange to me, and I underline it, that characters appearing in Talbot's novel are present in this story which is earlier.

What Do I mean? That it could also be that Talbot took things from Carr, from this Carr, despite the fact that he had claimed that his main inspiration was the Melville Davisson Post of the stories of Uncle Abner: both texts speak of an impossible murder, in in both cases a supernatural situation enters into it (only that in Carr it could be true, in Talbot it is shown that it was not in reality), in both cases there is a double that is a double (in Carr's story it is true, in the novel of Talbot no), in both cases there is recourse to the theme of the putrefaction of bodies post mortem (in Talbot it is the cause of the problem: a curse aimed at making a body rot in a short time; in Carr the effect: the double killed himself a few days earlier); in both cases we speak of a "thing" lying on the bed and covered by the sheet (in Carr we speak of thing, a term also used by Talbot; Talbot adds that it looked like a "slug").

Also this time, the previous story of Le Fanu has its fundamental importance, just as Jim Marvell is also here The Man of Stone from the first story. If in Carr's tale, the narrow marking of the mysterious figure in an old-fashioned fur-collared coat would seem to be an omen, or at least an expression of an evil power (and the connection to Le Fanu is glaring), Carr revolutionizes the whole, because if Tony fears that stalking because he thinks he wants to somehow make an attempt on his life, in reality the figure just wants to save him. Uncle Jim loved him and therefore would not have wanted him dead even when he was dead. Instead, it is as if his suffocating presence were the only move to guarantee Tony to stay alive: in fact, he was already the victim, not knowing it, of an unsuccessful attempt at "perfect crime" only because an unsuitable killer was chosen. to the role because unable to kill.

It would have been a perfect murder if Tony Marvell had disappeared after getting on the ship, and another Tony Marvell exactly like him had materialized in his place, as it would have been a perfect crime if "The Iron Mask" had replaced him. Louis XIV, condemning him in his place to an ancestral imprisonment in the Bastille). And the connection to the second story is immediate if we think of the double in charge of replacing him at his home. Instead Stephen's perfect murder if you don't believe the suicide theory (why would he scream and why would he lock Tony's bedroom door from the outside, why surely the housekeeper didn't? ), it certainly is, but accomplished by a living dead, by his uncle who woke up from eternal sleep.

Just Roberto Sonaglia (translator of the story into Italian), gives me the opportunity to underline another character of this story that resides not only in its having a supernatural double ending, but also in being a Gothic story. In this regard, Sonaglia wrote an article on the Gothic in Carr, published - as an appendix to G.M. 1821 of 1983, in which the unpublished Carr He Wouldn't Kill Patience was published - together with two articles by Boncompagni and one by Lippi. Here is a short extract that also applies to the story in question:

“Carr does even more; proposing a particular dimension of the mysterious, developed at the time by Gaston Leroux, he even plays on the existence / nonexistence of the supernatural, an artifice much more suited to our shrewd minds that ideally smile at ghosts and, however, do not yet know whether to believe or less to a metaphysical reality. This elegant game, as in the neo-gothic, presents all the symptoms of an aesthetic taste biophile, retracing the path traced by the classic ghost story where the spirit, with its incorporeality, already moves the index from the carnal to the impalpable, from the horror to the mystery."

Roberto Sonaglia thought is clearly acceptable, and it is applicable - also for what I have said - when for example it insinuates that the figure hiding behind a plant on the ocean liner, is the old Jim Marvel, or rather his ghost, indicated by one detail, the old-fashioned fur collar of the coat old Jim used; or when this figure insinuates that he is present on the train, that he follows Tony to the taxi that will take him home, that she is the one that makes the taxi skid so that Tony arrives home not immediately so that he, the undead can tail him , steal the gun and then kill.

However, the story in addition to the gothic and supernatural characters that can happen are complementary (for example the old austere, dark house, with noises and creaks, and a ghost or in any case a living dead, are two clearly combinable subjects), also has the fantastic one. In fact, the way as it leaves the reader, alternatively viable, the path of the impossible murder carried out by a being who enters the room and then literally vanishes there without a trace or that of suicide just as unlikely knowing the victim (traceable for example in the two other stories cited and in the novel The Burning Court), causes the reader to be interested in the kind of estrangement Todorov talks about in his essay on the fantastic.

Reflecting at this point on all three stories, it can be said that the first tells the bare facts, while the second and third enrich it with the impossibility that was not foreseen in the one of 1937. In addition, the second and third, markedly underline the supernatural character of the story, and enrich it with elements not present if not hidden in the first: eg. the tension. In the second and third, but especially in the second, the tension is increased to spasmodic levels in the subway, in dark and not crowded places, where tension is the consequence of the fear of being reached by something that is not known, and that wants at all costs reach you. It is therefore a tension created by also resorting to psychological expedients. Furthermore, Carr creates here a story that has many points of contact with Horror, and if you see well, beyond the editorial destination of the second story, the first already possesses these stylistic features, which he shares with many other works, contained in The Hafervordian and also in some novels with Bencolin, such as It Walks By Night, Castle Skull and The Waxworks Murder (aka The Corpse in the Waxworks).

Finally, the second and third versions of the story are much more justicialist than the first version, as they focus on the condemnation that is not only human but also and above all otherworldly of the offender, who when he is killed by the supernatural creature or kills himself , it is as if he is forever condemned to damnation.